James Abbott MacNeill Whistler (1834-1903) was not an easy man, he
was arrogant, picked fights with his friends and did not hesitate to drag a
critic of his work to the courts.
He was also
a very talented painter who started as a realist, but soon became known for the
way he used colours. He took inspiration from everyday life and emotion was
more important than perfect details. He took a lot of inspiration from Japanese
drawings, that had become popular in the 19th century in Europe.
Whistler often gave his paintings names of musical
pieces, like a nocturne or an arrangement or a symphony, because Music does not
describe and then it is left open for interpretation.
His work was
both hated and admired. Works were refused both by the Salon in Paris and the
Royal Academy in London, but sometimes a painting did get in.
His
portraits in full length were admired and also gained him commissions.
With the Falling rocket Whistler seemed to have bit of more than he could chew. The famous
artcritic Ruskin accused him of defrauding the public by just throwing some
paint on the canvas. Whistler took
Ruskin to court for this and won, but the process left him bankrupt. He
immediately went to Venice, where he could get a commission.
A friend
and an artdealer went into his studio and took the paintings that were left
there, to see if he could sell them. One of these works was Symphony in white, girl in musselin dress.
This painting ended up in the hand of Mr and Mrs Singer, who were building an
art collection in The Netherlands.
When their
private collection became a museum in 1956, the painting by Whistler was one of the highlights of
the museum. Only shortly after there were doubts if this really was a Whistler. The seize of the painting did
not fit and other things also did not add up. The painting was moved to the
depot and never taken out again.
Until
recently. A new investigation was done, looking at the techniques and the
material. The result of that investigation is that it is indeed a painting by Whistler.
The paint
that was used was the same Whistler
used, and the technique of layering very thin layers of paint also matches.
The different stages of the investigation |
The
discrepancies with his other works can be explained by actions of the art dealer who took
the painting. He cut it up to a smaller size so it could be sold quicker and he
had somebody else paint the background, since the painting was not finished
when he took it. But the girl in front is undoubtedly by Whistler.
The Singer museum in Laren is very proud to
say they have a Whistler in their
collection (again). They have organized a small exhibition with the painting,
and two other paintings they have borrowed from other collections (one from Amsterdam
and one from Glasgow). There you can also see what the investigation brought to
light.
Last
Saturday we went there and also listened to a lecture about Whistler, very interesting I can say! The lecture was a one-time event, but the exposition of the Whistlers can be seen until January 17th 2016.
Fascinating story! I have learnt something interesting today! Thank you!
ReplyDeleteYou are welcome, it was indeed very fascinating to hear how thet first thought it was not a Whistler and why it is indeed a Whistler after all.
DeleteKind regards,
I love Whistler's paintings, especially his Japanese-inspired ones. Great post...as always. :) And I hope you have a very Merry Christmas!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Lark, always good to hear :-)
DeleteAnd a very happy Christmas for you!
Kind regards,